Back to Making Tax Simpler
Collection of large datasets

Do you agree with a more explicit collection power that covers remote access and bulk information datasets?

Remote accessing of information

More taxpayers are storing information using “cloud” technology and using cloud-based software.  While Inland Revenue is able to use its search powers to access information remotely in some situations, these powers require review to ensure Inland Revenue can access this information in all relevant circumstances.  To maintain the integrity of the tax system, it is important this information can be accessed in the same way as information stored digitally or physically on a taxpayer’s premises.

The Search and Surveillance Act contains specific provisions on remote access search powers.  A “remote access search” is a search of an item such as internet data storage facility that does not have a physical address that a person can access and search.  The powers in the Search and Surveillance Act, however, are crafted in relation to remote access searches authorised by search warrants.  In many cases Inland Revenue’s search powers are carried out without need for a search warrant (unless it is a search of a private dwelling).

Currently Inland Revenue accesses “cloud” or other remotely stored information in the course of exercising its search powers under the Tax Administration Act – that is, when on-site at a business premises or private dwelling and the relevant storage is open.  This might be, for example, an email account that is open on the computer at the premises being searched.  Certainty is needed on whether Inland Revenue is able to access electronically stored information under the following circumstances:

  • when the account is closed and password protected;
  • when the information is encrypted; or
  • when information has been deleted remotely by the taxpayer upon Inland Revenue entering the premises.

To ensure Inland Revenue has the ability to obtain necessary or relevant information, no matter how stored, the Government proposes clarifying the rules around remote access searches by Inland Revenue.  The preferred approach is to align the rules in the Search and Surveillance Act with clarification of how Inland Revenue uses the remote access rules, recognising that many Inland Revenue searches are carried out without requirement for a warrant.  This will entail some remedial amendments to the legislative provisions governing remote access.

Clarifying the collection power

The Government proposes building on Inland Revenue’s ability to collect external datasets, to better enable regular, repeat collection of such information.  This would mean new additional powers, rather than a replacement of any part of the current rules.  The primary focus of the proposed powers is on ensuring Inland Revenue has the ability to regularly collect external datasets, when the Commissioner considers collection is necessary or relevant, for compliance, analytical or customer education purposes, rather than for use in pre-populating returns.  However, where a dataset collected for compliance or analytical reasons is also of use in pre-populating returns, this use would not be restricted.

Where it is considered that information should be collected regularly to support pre-populating returns the Government considers a formal third-party reporting regime would be an appropriate option.  This is because the provision of this information regularly can impose compliance costs.  These costs must be balanced against the wider benefit to society resulting from greater detection of under-reported or non-reported income, and the efficiency of collecting the information in a large dataset rather than needing to seek information from many taxpayers, including perhaps those that are not operating within the tax system.

Comments

MichaelAngelo
I have concern about this if it is not part of a tax payers normal record keeping system. Surely these provisions would only be used in extreme cases where corporate fraud is suspected and would require search warrants?

Do you agree with this comment?

  • agree1
  • disagree3
8 months ago
Greg
It seems sensible to update the rules to include modern day technology such as cloud storage. The essence of the rules should not change, but if more clarity around access to all necessary and relevant data locations is required then the update is warranted.

Do you agree with this comment?

  • agree2
  • disagree3
8 months ago
Scroll To Top